This article is published as part of Capsticks’ Medical Malpractice and Casualty Forward View 2023.

The government’s response to the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Authority’s 2022 consultation on the future shape of clinical trials is awaited. If the proposals are adopted they are likely to have a significant impact on both organisations running clinical trials and trial participants.

The proposals are designed to encourage research - in particular the removal of obstacles to innovation (whilst maintaining robust oversight) and streamlining clinical trials regulation.

Reducing unnecessary burden on those running trials and embedding proportionality is central to the framework.

The suggestion that obtaining consent in ‘cluster trials’ (where approved medicines are given to participants to compare available treatments) should be simplified, is one example of how the proposals may have an impact on risk. At the moment written consent is required from every ‘cluster trial’ participant, despite the trial medicine providing little or no additional risk because the participant is randomised to have a standard treatment routinely prescribed for their condition.

Medical Malpractice and Casualty Forward View 2023

This article is part of Capsticks’ Medical Malpractice and Casualty Forward View 2023.

Read the other articles featured in this publication below:

    Get in touch

    Aiming to be the firm of choice for medical malpractice and casualty insurers, we advise and support on all aspect of claims and inquests.

    To discuss how any of these issues may affect your organisation, please get in touch with Majid Hassan or Chery Blundell.