Public Law, Judicial Review and Statutory Appeals

We act for regulators in the healthcare, legal and veterinary sectors, as well as many NHS bodies and private sector providers of public services, advising on their powers and duties and defending challenges to their decisions by way of judicial review claims and statutory appeals. 

Our recent experience includes:

  • Acting for a regulator as an Interested Party in highly sensitive judicial review claim against the disciplinary tribunal which challenged a decision to refuse to anonymise the Claimant’s name in a tribunal judgment.
  • Acting for a regulator in a judicial review claim in respect of a decision to close a complaint on the basis that it did not disclose any breach of the relevant regulatory framework.
  • Acting for a regulator in a threatened judicial review claim in respect of its handling of an application for recognition of an educational programme.

Our in-depth understanding of the legal and regulatory frameworks that apply to your organisation mean we can “hit the ground running” when dealing with urgent and complex issues.

We adopt a pragmatic problem-solving approach aimed at reducing the risk that your decisions will be challenged.

We have a strong track record of successfully defending our clients in judicial review claims. We have acted in more than 30 judicial reviews in the last year.

Our costs in judicial review cases are consistently lower than those of the other firms we come across

How can Capsticks help?

  • Robust decision-making

    We review board papers and resolutions, and produce checklists so that decision-makers can demonstrate that they have taken account of all relevant considerations and legal duties. Once decisions have been made, we will help you to draft decision letters in order to comply with the public law requirement to give reasons.

  • Responding to pre-action letters

    If you receive pre-action correspondence threatening judicial review, we will draft letters of response under the Judicial Review Pre-Action Protocol to help you to head off a potential legal claim. If our initial analysis suggests that there may have been flaws in the original decision-making we will alert you to this so that you can consider alternatives to litigation.

  • Defending judicial review claims and statutory appeals

    We regularly represent regulators in the Administrative Court and Court of Appeal and have a strong track record of successfully defending judicial review claims and statutory appeals. Many of the judicial reviews that we defend are dismissed at the permission stage which avoids the costs and time commitment needed for a full hearing. By providing swift and rigorous analysis and, where appropriate, a robust response to public law challenges we will best protect both:

    • The delivery of your public protection obligations, by ensuring that your decisions are upheld when subject to judicial scrutiny; and
    • The protection of your position as a strong and sustainable regulator, by ensuring the consistent presentation of your position to courts and other stakeholders, and the cost-effective delivery of responses to challenge.
  • Regulatory functions, powers and duties

    Capsticks is familiar with the legal framework which regulators operate under and can advise on the exercise of your regulatory functions; the extent of your statutory powers and the application of legal duties including the Public Sector Equality Duty. We regularly provide assurance to regulators that they are not acting ultra vires and that their decisions are consistent with public law principles.

Show allHide all